Affordable housing and River Forest

Proponents of expanding access say the village isn't doing enough

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Lacey Sikora

Contributing Reporter

In June, facing a state deadline of June 28, the River Forest Board of Trustees voted to approve an affordable housing plan for the village. Illinois required all towns with fewer than 10 percent affordable housing to file plans for how they would reach the goal of 10 percent affordable housing. 

Affordable housing is defined as housing costs that are no more than 30 percent of gross income. Households spending more than 30 percent are considered housing cost-burdened.

Lawyer Dan Lauber, a local resident who has worked on fair housing issues since 1985 and is a vocal proponent of more affordable housing, has followed the debate in River Forest while advocating for more affordable housing. 

River Forest's affordable housing share is currently 9 percent. Lauber contends that while public support for more robust affordable housing measures in River Forest is strong, the board's current plan is not strong enough. He details his opposition at the website

Chief among Lauber's concerns is that in drafting the affordable housing plan for the village's Plan Commission, consultant John Houseal lifted large portions of the affordable housing plan from a plan previously adopted by the village of Wilmette. Lauber says the 2004 Wilmette plan was so poorly received that village officials and citizens wrote a new affordable housing plan three years later. Lauber also said that there were a number of amendments proposed that would make River Forest's affordable housing plan more impactful, but they were not adopted.

A few of the recommendations Lauber has made include adopting incentivized inclusionary zoning, adopting a policy that at least 15 percent of units in new multifamily developments be affordable, ensuring that in TIF districts existing affordable housing be maintained or replaced with affordable housing in new developments on a one-for-one basis, and establishing a goal of at least 10 percent affordable housing as opposed to a capping affordable housing units at 10 percent of village housing stock.

Lauber notes that all of his suggestions were rejected. Instead the village agreed to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and to increase supportive integrated housing, which is housing for people with disabilities or those needing support services.  

Lauber, who has worked with municipalities across the nation on affordable housing, says that the data shows ADUs are not a viable affordable housing solution. 

"It's not going to result in a burst of activity," he said. "It's mostly relatives who move in. It won't expand the affordable housing supply or effect diversity. It's a small tool."

For Lauber, the most effective tool is mandatory inclusionary zoning, and he notes that over 900 cities have adopted the model. Another tool that he thinks could work in River Forest is converting existing apartments into low-equity co-ops.

He expressed frustration that of all the public letters and comments sent to the board in advance of the adoption of the plan, all but one resident spoke in favor of affordable housing, but this support didn't seem to sway the board. 

"It's so cool to me that we're saying yes to affordable housing in our backyard," Lauber said. "But, the majority of the village board and planning commission were saying maybe."

Phyllis Rubin is one of those residents who wrote to trustees and made a public comment supporting a strong affordable housing plan. She said that many object to affordable housing because they think it will bring down property values, but she says that's not true. 

"Affordable housing in neighborhoods like River Forest doesn't decrease property values and can even increase property values," she said. 

She cites the success Highland Park has had with their inclusionary housing plan and advocates for a similar plan. 

"We should look at all of the research, integrate the affordable housing into the community so it's done well, and it will be fine," Rubin said. "We should look at people who've done it well and take our advice from them."

River Forest resident Megan Keskitalo also spoke in favor of a stronger plan. She said that as an anthropologist, equity issues are part of her training. 

"Top of my mind is equity," Keskitalo said. "One of the most important components of equity is who gets to live here?"

She says that the village should use outside experts to help determine the best path forward and that zoning changes should be made to make sure developers aren't awarded variances without including affordable housing units in their projects. 

Keskitalo would also welcome more research into the numbers of households in River Forest that are housing cost-burdened. Keskitalo is hopeful that in implementing the plan going forward, the village will continue to look to experts and data to shape future decisions. 

Village Trustee Patty Henek, who recently announced she's running for village president in the 2021 election, expressed frustration with the process as well as the outcome. 

She along with trustees Katie Brennan and Erika Bachner voted against the plan adopted at the June 8 meeting. President Cathy Adduci joined Respicio Vazquez, Tom Cargie and Bob O'Connell in voting to adopt the plan as presented.

Henek said she worries the process was rushed and does not reflect the current environment in the village. She said that at least 60 residents emailed asking for a stronger plan, and says that essentially adopting an old plan used by Wilmette does not make sense. 

"Even if our direction on affordable housing was different months ago, it's clear at this point in time and in this climate, we had to do something different," Henek said. 

Noting the timing of the recent protests demanding an end to institutional racism across the country and in Chicago, Henek said, "It's time to put actions to words. We're all learning, but to ensure we have a better plan, that means everyone staying on top of next steps and paying attention."

Adduci, who is running for a third term as president, says that the approved plan involves six steps, and that village staff will be tasked with crafting ordinances and policies to put the plan into place.

Those six steps include recommendations that the board allow taller and denser developments in commercial and mixed-use areas; explore strategies and means to preserve and enhance existing affordable housing; amend zoning ordinance to allow ADUs; explore zoning ordinances so that the village can support integrative supportive housing; amend plan development standards so affordable housing is one of the standards developers have to go through; and take eligible TIF funds and allow them to be used for affordable housing.

Adduci stressed that the process is not over and will take time to flesh out. 

"It's not a switch, it's a process. It's a journey," Adduci said. "The hope is that in the next one to two years, we have a significant affordable housing plan that will get us past the 10 percent goal. You have to start somewhere."

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Janet Saeger from River Forest  

Posted: August 18th, 2020 6:39 PM

Spot On, Tom MacMilan!

Bruce Kline  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 10:38 PM

Good one Ramona! LOL.

Ramona Lopez  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 9:38 PM

@ Jeffrey. I find you even more amusing. You have so much in common with the fake tan guy in the oval office. If you own a home Jeffrey, the government has been subsidizing you as well with your tax break for your mortgage interest and the property taxes you pay. Then again, that probably never crossed your mind. See how you and 45 both live in gov't subsidized housing.

Jeffrey Smith  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 5:46 PM

Most amusing to hear from people who prefer government subsidized unaffordable housing, like Mar-A-Lago or the Trump Hotel in DC. These are the sounds of dinosaurs as the comet approached.

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 4:40 PM

My argument against new government subsidized affordable housing - 801 S. Oak Park Avenue. An oversized $15 million building that will pay $48,000 in property taxes. Go take a look.

Mick McDonnell  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 3:18 PM

Amen, Tom MacMillan!!

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 1:02 PM

Did anyone vote Dan Lauber into a position where what he thinks matters more than the other 10,902 people in town thinks? We are already seeing that mandatory inclusionary zoning in Oak Park makes a joke out of zoning rules, putting projects that are too big into neighborhoods, and passes extra costs onto other citizens in the new developments. There is a whole world out there to live in that is affordable.

Jeffrey Smith  

Posted: August 12th, 2020 11:32 AM

Does this mean that River Forest / Affordable Housing is no longer and oxymoron?

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments