A disconnect on race

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Editorial

The days keep passing and Oak Park's opportunity to lead on issues of race and policing keep receding amid a mass resignation from the Community Relations Commission and more non-productive talk at the village board table. 

Those two issues are not unrelated. 

An inability to lead on this issue is the low point in the tenure of Anan Abu-Taleb's seven successful years as mayor. He seems tone deaf to both the urgency and the nuance of this debate. 

After the village government stumbled about over multiple years trying to address issues of racial equity — acknowledging its own shortfalls, adding expertise in creating a lens of equity in decision-making, tackling training of the board, administration and rank and file to open its eyes wider — it failed to achieve anything like consensus when it finally acted to hire an equity training firm.

It left an already frustrated Community Relations Commission on the outside of decision-making, inevitably faced a divided village board of seven people who never had an ability or willingness to talk openly and empathetically with each other about hard issues, and, not surprisingly, went looking for equity expertise after every other town in America was casting about for the same help. 

An hour's discussion at a board meeting a week ago was illustrative of just how lost this board is on this issue. Absent leadership from the mayor, absent trust and goodwill among trustees, the discussion caromed about, even with seeming allies missing opportunities to connect.

The clearest message we might have heard is that there is general agreement that Oak Park should look at how citizen oversight of police works in this town. We'd extend that to say it raises important questions about the transparency of the disciplinary processes on the force. And there may be general agreement that, unlike many police departments in America, use-of-force policy and actions are not an underlying concern in Oak Park. That is huge.

We'd boil it down this way — and we'd acknowledge that contentious meetings by Zoom are always going to add confusion. The board discussion to this point has been unhelpful and lacking clarity. This board does not actually know what its goals are for moving forward on improved policing. This board does not agree on what outside resources it should bring to the table or what it would be asking a third party to do. If staff understands what it is being tasked to do, it is clairvoyant.

There seem to be two public meetings next week. Topic and format still being developed except we're told it isn't designed as a conversation and it isn't the time to directly ask questions of the police department. OK. Why? But OK.

There are two village board meetings set aside in August to discuss policing. Unclear what those agendas look like.

We'd go back to where we started several weeks ago, if it is not too late to go back there. Oak Park has a strong police chief in LaDon Reynolds. He is thoughtful and knowledgeable about policing. He is proud of Oak Park's department but not blind to its faults. He has a listening ear. He is highly respected among peers. He has the life experience of a Black man.

We could do worse than setting aside two hours just talking and listening. The police chief should be there. Maybe a facilitator. Honest criticism. A place where hurt and fear can be expressed. A place where a cop's worries could also be shared. A format that is open to data already collected by activists where the goal is not to refute it but to understand it.

The village board would be welcome to attend but would not have a speaking role. 

Listening. That's where this divided board should start.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

9 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Mofoso Given Fisto from texas  

Posted: August 26th, 2020 7:25 AM

My first symptoms of ALS occurred in 2011, but was diagnosed in 2013. I had severe symptoms ranging from shortness of breath, balance problems, couldn't walk without a walker or a power chair, i had difficulty swallowing and fatigue. I was given medications which helped but only for a short burst of time, then i decided to try alternative measures and began on ALS Formula treatment from Akanni herbal centre , It has made a tremendous difference for me (Visit www. akanniherbalcentre .com). I had improved walking balance, increased appetite, muscle strength, improved eyesight and others. 

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 9th, 2020 10:07 AM

Huh! I came up empty. Thanks, will look harder.

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: August 8th, 2020 11:55 PM

William Dwyer, Jr.: He IS on Facebook hawking the same nonsense

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 8th, 2020 10:29 PM

That name doesn't even come up in a Facebook search, Kevin. So I'm not sure what's going on. I flagged this clown too.

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: August 8th, 2020 10:22 PM

Why do these ads for quack remedies stay on here for so long (from "Nokue Lando" who has posted numerous times)? I've already flagged the person but these people post at night and on the weekends when the WI staff can't spot them.

Les Golden  

Posted: August 8th, 2020 7:38 AM

There is only one issue: Massive crime suffered by the residents of Oak Park disproportionately by African-Americans from Chicago combined with a nationwide-leading massive murder rate in Chicago. BLM, street paintings, removing school WPA murals, desecrating statutes of George Washington, and attacking the cops are all irrelevant. How do we stop the crime and reduce the murder rate? BLM is a joke: For every African-American killed by a cop in Chicago there are 1000 African-Americans murdered by other African-Americans. Don't the BLM people consider those predominantly young lives worth saving? If not, they are politically-rabid hypocrites. If yes, what are they doing to combat the crime and reduce the murder rate? Painting street murals?

Jeffrey Smith  

Posted: July 31st, 2020 8:30 AM

Any day now I expect the closet KKK members who so effectively make their presence felt on these pages to come out of the closet - or out from under their sheets - and just say what they long to say and which their führer daily, smugly and viciously suggests. In the world of the right, there is no "we", only "me."

Nick Polido  

Posted: July 31st, 2020 7:06 AM

The disconnect here is with these editorials, as if a great meeting can solve the race issues we face. Let's not stop with commending Chief Reynolds, how about all the men and women in our police department that serve.....

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: July 31st, 2020 12:09 AM

The we in this editorial are who exactly?

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments