Equity opportunity

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

Our Views

What was expected to be a night of ritual and tradition as veterans left the Oak Park village board and new arrivals took their seats, turned into something more intense last week. The practice of reaffirming Oak Park's Diversity Statement, a document written in the 1970s and modestly expanded over the years, along with our collective consciousness, turned unexpectedly controversial.

We could focus on the controversy which, in some part, whirled around issues of public input and open process — or, as we choose to do, turn to the substance of the debate.

In the end the original Diversity Statement was approved, though not by its usual unanimous margin. And, we hope, the stage was set for a new, more open and more inclusive discussion not just about broadening the statement to reflect a determined commitment in village government to issues of race equity but to move forward on a wide-ranging equity policy initiative which makes real the rhetoric of any Diversity Statement.

Oak Park's village government has been slow-walking an equity policy for too long. Whether it is the cost to a consultant for the necessary equity training across all parts of the government, the further investment in crafting equity policies and effective measures, or if there is some level of opposition to an equity policy, all need to be directly discussed by the village board under the leadership of Mayor Anan Abu-Taleb. 

Already, village government has been lapped by the three public school districts in Oak Park and River Forest which now have in place comprehensive equity policies. There's no shame in that, as much of the focus on equity rightly relates to public education. But it does not let our municipal government off the hook on a topic that needs to tackle substantive issues related to systemic racism in our institutions — think housing, policing, hiring. 

It is time for village government to get serious and enthusiastic about equity. This new board needs an open conversation around a still-new concept that we acknowledge can be challenging to define (hint: don't over-define it) and brings with it some fresh jargon (we're still trying to figure out "intersectionality."). Then it needs to be sent to the Community Relations Commission with high expectations for public input and a reasonably short timeline for delivery of a plan.

Simultaneously, the CRC should go back to work on an open process to update the Diversity Statement in a pivotal moment of equity focus. The draft which, to the surprise of some and the delight of others, wound up in trustees' inboxes just last week is a good start. We think it needs more precision, a tight edit, and some wordsmithing which captures the aspiration and the expectation we set for ourselves. 

Was it an awkward start to a newly launched village board? Mildly. Mainly it is a fresh opportunity to lead on a foundational issue for our village. Let's get to this.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Carl Nyberg from Chicago  

Posted: May 29th, 2019 10:33 AM

The idea that the members of commissions aren't elected, so therefore their work doesn't count is wrong. People are appointed to commissions by a process that recruits people, considers applicants and tries to match skills an interests. The U.S. system of governance (in theory) supports that anyone who meets minimal requirements & passes through the process can participate. The VOP board of trustees should be using the commission process more, not less. Commissions have the time to get into the details of all sorts of policy. Working out 70-100% of the details in commissions is good management by the board of trustees. Decisions SHOULD be DELEGATED as much as possible. This isn't to say the board of trustees shouldn't modify documents that come out of commissions, but the board of trustees should respect the work done by commissions & build on it.

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: May 16th, 2019 7:01 AM

No one voted for anyone on that CRC commission. So the intersectionality of it all is wrong.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments