Oak Park's new motto: 'All that is excellent'

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

One View

Heidi Ruehle, your Jan. 29 One View [Village and Pete's can do better at Oak Park and Madison, Viewpoints] was an excellent, authoritative piece about Oak Park and its history of architectural richness and the importance of respecting and continuing this legacy. 

There were, additionally, excellent comments by Oak Park residents, which demonstrate the "collective intelligence" many of us love about living in this community. Unfortunately, it is a gift ignored, more often than not, by our leaders, and, as a result, that rich heritage is slowly being eroded by allowing poor design by developers and poor planning and scrutiny by the present village board and the village's planning department. 

There's no excuse for this. Elected officials, planners and developers seem to have that patronizing stumbling-block attitude: "We know what's best for you." Hard to figure that out. Ego?

We have the resources needed to continue protecting and expanding the valuable architectural history and its features of our village. We have wonderfully-informed architects, experts willing to advise and guide the decisions under consideration. Frank Heitzman, for example. Frank has spent countless hours helping all of us to be well-informed on the history and potential value of retaining historic structures like 644 Madison Street, the Foley Rice (or Hill Motor Co. or Packard) building. 

But our local government continues to ignore these recommendations in planning a community. The wisdom comes from people experienced in historic preservation in other agencies — like yourself, Heidi — people knowledgeable with what an incredible resource Oak Park's diversity of architecture is, the work of over 100 architects, a "living laboratory" of American architecture, and how this stands to benefit a community in every way. That doesn't mean allowing mediocre or bad architectural projects. That means looking for excellence in design and construction. But, unfortunately, that hasn't yet happened with boards in the recent past.

This past weekend, I drove from Devon (north), to Lake Street (south), I thought it was the perfect example of bad planning and sub-standard designs. That's what happens when local governments muck up planning, including not cooperating with another adjacent town. You get an ugly mish-mash. We do not want that lack of aesthetic consideration on Madison Street or anywhere else in Oak Park. 

There are examples in the city, like North Clark Street, that are examples of how preservation creates better shopping areas and places that have character and saves the existing buildings, which people actually want to visit. We want this standard of excellence for our diverse population — not to serving just one demographic as we sadly see the variance of standards and/or lack of them, based on wealth or poverty in various parts of the city and suburbs.

Heidi, you said, "The current plan is not only in direct violation of Oak Park's zoning ordinance design standards; the lackluster design screams of indifference to Oak Park's longstanding tradition of design excellence." That's the problem now, not in every project, but in the majority of the projects approved and built in Oak Park. 

I believe the majority of Oak Parkers aspire to incorporate excellence in all planning, design and construction going on in Oak Park. Citizens know it is a reasonable, achievable and responsible goal, one of the important components we inherited from the generations before us that has made the village stand out, world renowned as a unique village. Oak Parkers traditionally worked to preserve the environment; to preserve the spirit of community while it grows and evolves; and to protect the quality of the architecture, which continues contributing to make the community a desirable place to live. 

Let's not quit now and become the generation that threw it all away.

Reading your comments, Heidi, I kept thinking of the motto at OPRF High School. "Those Things That Are Best." It's great to think that young people would take that to heart and keep that lifelong as they make choices and make their way in the world. Does Oak Park have a similar motto? I don't think so. Oak Park has only the slogan, "Step Out of Line." That's a weird one, ambiguous and non-specific. 

What if we ratchet up the high school motto to one suitable for the village, all of us, and adopt the motto "All that is excellent" ("Quod optimum est") to help us remember collectively to continue striving for a standard of excellence in all endeavors?

Christine Vernon is a lifelong resident of Oak Park.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Tommy McCoy  

Posted: February 14th, 2020 5:16 PM

Christine Vernon Nice editorial although " striving for a standard of excellence" gets in the way of profit. Profit is the driving force. You are looking at Oak Park when people knew what they hard. The newer citizen's look at a box built on a piece of land as the new way for architecture. When you mention ego, could it possibly be money since that once again drives development. This is not Chicago, where design is very important to fit in with other developments. This is Oak Park and does not need to go through much to get approved. Can a developer do better or a business do better is the question and the answer is why should they if it is not going to improve the bottom line. The new generation will get use to it, and there are still homes that recognize architecture for people who want to come a visit it. It is no longer the nice little Village that once was

Christopher Goode  

Posted: February 14th, 2020 12:38 PM

Thanks Christine, I am with you on this one! There are more of us out there pushing to save the Hill and to make a better project on that corner than our trustee's would think.

Heidi Ruehle  

Posted: February 11th, 2020 3:50 PM

Thank you, Christine, for the insightful article encouraging the preservation of the Hill Motor Co building and thoughtful planning for the village in general.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments