Why the rec center should go to a vote

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Jack Powers

One view

The Park District of Oak Park (PDOP) cites a 2019 survey of 618 households as rationale for building a Park District Rec Center. 

The survey, no mention of costs, found that "nearly 50% of respondents expressed a need or interest in a fitness center, indoor pool and indoor track for their household. However, 80% of respondents stated a Community Recreation Center (CRC) is needed in Oak Park if it is constructed without a tax increase. Support was stronger for a CRC when survey respondents learned the gym space would be available to middle- and high-school students free of charge during afterschool hours" (this per the PDOP website).

According to the Cook County Clerk's website, Oak Park has 40,814 registered voters/taxpayers.

The park district survey of 618 represented just 1.5% of registered voters/taxpayers. The "nearly" 50% (meaning less than a majority) or 309 or so respondents perceiving a need for a village rec center represented a meager .0075% of registered voters/taxpayers, and the approximate 80% or 494 or so who favored the rec center if built without a tax increase, represented just 1.21% of registered voters/taxpayers. Again, costs were not part of the survey questions.

Here's the only relevant survey that truly matters: On Election Day, Nov. 3, Oak Park voters/taxpayers voted on an advisory referendum that said, "Shall any capital expenditure of $5 million or more by any local taxing body within Oak Park be subject to a binding referendum for approval or rejection by the voters?" The result was overwhelming, 13,178 or 78.4% yes, 3,627 or 21.6% no.

The park district has already earmarked $5 million in property taxes for this proposed facility (including a redundant pool — just cover Ridgeland Common pool and be done with it). That's not counting another $1.5 million in property tax money allocated by Oak Park Township. This combined $6.5 million could be returned to the taxpayers. Nor does it include an $875,000 grant from the functionally bankrupt state of Illinois, nor a $2.5 million PARC grant from the state of Illinois (which may approve these allocations but may be unable to deliver the money, leaving the park district holding that bag, as has happened elsewhere). 

Phase 1 is estimated to cost $18 million, of which $9,875,000 would come from tax money, assuming the state money is real, the rest from purportedly donated funds. The facility would be built on donated land, a sizable portion of Madison Street real estate, permanently removing it from the property tax rolls, a significant opportunity cost not to be overlooked. The park district board states that the facility would be permanently self-sustaining without property tax money via user fees and memberships, but they cannot guarantee that.

The scope of this project, the opportunity costs, the financial risk and the permanent park district obligation (meaning taxpayers) this facility becomes is far too large not to take it to the taxpayers in a referendum, 13,178 of whom voted to say they want to have a say in capital expenditures of $5 million or more.

To the park district board, are you prepared to ignore 13,178 taxpayers who have expressed a need to vote on such a large capital expenditure? If you are, why?

To the District 200 school board, same questions.

Jack Powers is a resident of Oak Park.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: November 20th, 2020 2:26 PM

This is the Edsel issue.. Ford Motor Company asked people what kind of car do you want. The response was a big car, full of gadgets, with no price mentioned. Edsel was a flop. Years later Ford Motor Company asked people what kind of car do you want for under $2500.00 dollars. The response was a long nose short trunk sports car type vehicle, 2 door, floor mounted automatic transmission with a list of options they could add on to, , and they made the Mustang. It is all in the questions you ask, yes/no or essay answers. I wonder if the question was asked, "Will you use this this facility?"facility? And "At what price are you willing to pay to use .How I do love that 1967 Fastback GT Mustang, 289, four speed ,factory air, factory disc brakes, no smog emission controls and no power steering, silver with red interior, red GT stripes sitting in my garage. I got it a little late, but just the way I wanted it.

Bill Maxwell  

Posted: November 20th, 2020 12:24 PM

Tom MacMillan I told a car sales person that those lines you are saying are old. She replied, why change them when they still work

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: November 20th, 2020 12:08 PM

Let's create a very biased survey, control who sees it, and make sure the answers are worded so we can say everyone wants a Rec Center. Then let's pretend that the survey somehow represents all the voters. That is the scam the Park District is doing, because they are afraid of the citizens having a real say. The lies and the gaming of the system are getting very old. We need to replace Jan Arnold. And since Cate Readling is also in the middle of this, that is a huge no for her becoming Mayor.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments