Yes, discrimination in housing is still ocurring in 2013

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Rob Breymaier

Executive Director, Oak Park Regional Housing Center

Recently the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Urban Institute (UI) published the 2012 Housing Discrimination Survey. HUD and UI conduct these surveys across the nation about once every 10 years. (It is not exactly every 10 years so that housing professionals don't know when exactly the survey will occur.)

The study uses a technique called "paired testing" that matches two people of similar characteristics in every aspect except the race, ethnicity, or, for the first time this year, sexual orientation of the testers. This allows to test against the one variable to account for discrimination. I was a test coordinator for the previous version of this survey when it was conducted in 2000. It is quite rigorous and the social scientists who run it are experts in their field. However, I do have some objections to their methodology that I think diminishes the differences they find. For instance, they do not include tests unless both testers receive a return call from the housing professional. So, if a white tester gets a call back and a black tester doesn't that test is not included despite the likely possibility that the black tester was avoided by the landlord. I say likely because in 2000 this often happened but never happened in the reverse.

Initially, the results look positive in that discrimination appears to be declining overall. However, the differences between what whites are told about and shown is still significantly higher than what is shown to people of color. Also, for the first time, sexual orientation was tested and showed that heterosexual couples also receive better treatment than same-sex couples.

Surprisingly, the survey found that in real estate Latinos received similar treatment to whites. However, in rental situations Latinos were told about 12.5% fewer units and shown 7.5% fewer units. Interestingly, these numbers were larger than the discrepancies for African Americans. Black testers were shown 11.4% fewer and shown 4.2% fewer units than white when looking for rentals. Asians were in between. White testers were told about 9.8% more units and shown 6.6% more units than Asian testers.

While Latinos didn't have significant differences in testing for sales of homes, African Americans and Asians did. Blacks were told about 17% fewer listings and shown 17.7% fewer homes. Asians were told about 15.5% fewer listings and shown 18.8% fewer homes.

The survey brings a few questions to my mind.

  1. This is the first time I've seen a survey where Latinos are treated equally to whites (for sales of homes). As I said above, it is a surprise and I'm curious about what is at the root of this change. It is even more curious given that Latinos are facing the greatest amount of discrimination in the rental arena.
  2. I was also surprised that Asians had greater discrepancies in showings than African Americans. When I analyze Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data, Asians have much higher lending rates than African Americans and Latinos. So, it is curious that Asians are being shown fewer homes but they are getting mortgages more often. I also wonder if there is a breakdown to test differences for East Asians (i.e. Japanese, Chinese, Koreans) and South Asians (i.e. Indians, Pakistanis). There are differences in treatments and stereotypes between the two groups.
  3. Discrimination has gotten more sophisticated and subtle over the past 40 years. I wonder how much of the decline in the survey is due to more subtle methods of discrimination. For instance, what happens after being told about and shown units? The study doesn't test if roadblocks are created for people of color when they decide to rent or purchase a specific unit or home.

Of course, discrimination is just a symptom of the twin diseases of prejudice and segregation. While the survey shows a need to increase efforts to combat discrimination, it makes even more clear (to e anyway) the need to improve integration and incentivize fair housing compliance for housing professionals. Discrimination enforcement is a reactive strategy. Integration and compliance are proactive.

In Oak Park, we are ahead of the game on these two more effective strategies. Our intentional efforts at the Housing Center, Village Hall, and through other partners sustain and improve an integrated community. And, our real estate community is exceptionally professional with a leadership that is truly invested in fair housing compliance.

Perhaps between now and the next survey HUD consider that the best strategy to lower the rate of discrimination is to replicate our strategy to approach fair housing proactively in communities across the country.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Rob Breymaier from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 20th, 2013 12:11 PM

Muntz, The study measure what real estate agents and landlords tell clients about. It is not a measure of what testers could find out on their own.

Rob Breymaier from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 20th, 2013 12:10 PM

Joe, The study removes income as a variable. Both testers have similar incomes and qualifications. So, the findings are not related to socioeconomics.


Posted: June 20th, 2013 11:25 AM

In the internet age, how is it possible to not be aware of homes for sale? You can get 99% of all listings online through MLS, realtor sites, FSBO, Craigslist. Do you need to be TOLD what's available? In my home search, I was aware of new homes on the market before/as soon as my realtor was. Most of the time she presented me with homes I was already knew about. Realtors only see one Show them the green and they'll take you around the world.

joe from south oak park  

Posted: June 20th, 2013 10:19 AM

I wonder if folks here are seeing a socioeconomic bias instead of a racial bias. That is, my real estate broker isn't going to show me a home in the Hemingway district because I cannot afford to own one. If i can only afford a house in the Austin neighborhood my options are severely limited if i wanted to move to OP. This isn't racism it's economics. Like many other things if you look very hard to find racism that is all you see and that may be one of the issues that Mr Breymaier is dealing with

Rob Breymaier from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 20th, 2013 9:56 AM

John, I'm no just speculating. I work with organizations that do fair housing enforcement. So, that point is based on evidence. It's the difference between enforcement and research. that said, discrimination is certainly less prevalent than it was 40 years ago. (The Housing Center by the way does not engage in testing or enforcement.)

eating from the trough from Oak park  

Posted: June 19th, 2013 5:56 PM

JBM: That is because some people make their money feeding from the taxpayer trough and need to reinforce the continued need for tax dollars to be spent so they can continue to live in the manner they are accustomed to.

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 19th, 2013 5:50 PM

Breymaier quote: "Discrimination has gotten more sophisticated and subtle over the past 40 years. I wonder how much of the decline in the survey is due to more subtle methods of discrimination." Your quote sounds a bit discriminating. That is; instead of seeing a reduction in racial discrimination, you see a subtle and sophisticated attempt to hide it.

Rob Breymaier from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 19th, 2013 3:32 PM

Please pardon the typos.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments