Something to think about before you vote
I'm not going to tell you who to vote for. You can go to the Journal's page describing all the candidates and make your decisions. But, I would like to suggest something to think about before voting – equity. I'm not saying it's the only issue. It is a critical issue though.
Whether for Village government or for school board, I hope you will take the time to think which candidates are most concerned about equity and are most likely to offer effective means to address it. In our community, we have a strong commitment to equity, fairness, and justice. No one is going to come out against these principles. But, how the candidates answer questions about equity tells us a lot about what they would do and if they have a reasonable chance of improving equity in the community.
Issues of equity in schools are fairly well known. The question I ask myself is, "Who among these candidates has the best understanding and ideas to ensure that every classroom will support the success of our children?" This is how I am determining who to vote for in District 200. In addition to making sure that our most challenging courses continue to prepare students for top–tier colleges, what will be done to improve other courses? Does the candidate propose that we widen OPRF offerings to promote courses for much needed middle-skills jobs that are currently under-filled despite high unemployment? Does the candidate support targeted tutoring and mentoring for students that are below grade level or at-risk? Does the candidate have ideas about how to promote more integrated settings in the high school so that kids of different races, incomes, and skills can find ways to learn from and support each other?
At Village Hall, I view equity as priorities. Does the candidate want to represent the entire village or a specific interest? Will the person you vote for work comprehensively or narrowly? Will the candidate focus on much-needed development on Madison Street, the Arts District, Chicago and Austin, Lake and Austin where economic development will have tremendous multiplier effects on the community? Will the new candidate lead with the ability to stand up to the inevitable criticism that is the norm of a hyper-educated population? Does the candidate have an appreciation for how the Village collaborates with other entities including non-profits, other governments, and businesses to improve the quality of life in the community?
Overall, we're lucky to live in a fantastic community. As I say often, we're not perfect but we are better off than just about anywhere else. But, we need to make sure the opportunities we have here are available to and enjoyed by everyone. On Tuesday, I hope you'll vote for the people you think will do the most to ensure opportunity and promote equity in our community.
Love the Journal?
Become our partner in independent community journalism
Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?
On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.
No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.
Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.
Reader Comments
2 Comments - Add Your Comment
Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.
Facebook Connect
Answer Book 2019
To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here. |
Quick Links
Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest. | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Subscribe | Classified |
Multimedia | Contact us |
Submit Letter To The Editor | |
Place a Classified Ad |
Latest Comments
You have missed some things in the highlights. There...
By Tom Leeds
Posted: January 21st, 2021 12:32 PM
HI, this comment is for Tom MacMillan: Hi Tom, I...
By Susan Buchanan
Posted: January 21st, 2021 11:12 AM
This is a wonderful story of how a person is able to...
By Bill Maxwell
Posted: January 21st, 2021 10:51 AM
This is wonderful! I look forward to getting my beans...
By Colin Taylor
Posted: January 21st, 2021 10:21 AM
I'm a bit in awe of David Silverstein and his...
By William Dwyer Jr.
Posted: January 21st, 2021 9:53 AM
What an inspiring story! Best of luck and looking...
By Jim Frenkel
Posted: January 21st, 2021 9:40 AM
This board is garbage. There was a slim approval for...
By Aaron Stigger
Posted: January 21st, 2021 9:36 AM
D200 board members seem to be as incapable as D97...
By Aaron Stigger
Posted: January 21st, 2021 9:33 AM
We all need to take a deep breath here. It's an...
By William Dwyer Jr.
Posted: January 21st, 2021 8:29 AM
Susan Raphael, every other board member indicated that...
By Jenny Austin
Posted: January 21st, 2021 8:06 AM
Also a Resident from Oak Park
Posted: April 5th, 2013 2:04 PM
@ Resident: Since voters for D200 Board do reside in OP (or RF), let's assume that kids who reside in OP (or RF) are indeed those to which Rob Breymeier refers when he says "our children." The board's policies may happen to benefit a few kids along the way whose folks have snuck them into OPRF while residing in elsewhere, but the thing to do about that is to continue to enforce the residency requirement; it won't affect the soundness or validity of other types of policy.
Resident
Posted: April 5th, 2013 7:59 AM
The question I ask myself is, "Who among these candidates has the best understanding and ideas to ensure that every classroom will support the success of the children who legitimately reside in Oak Park?".