Envisioning Oak Park

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Rob Breymaier

Executive Director, Oak Park Regional Housing Center

Last week, along with over 100 others, I attended the Envision Oak Park kick-off event. This was my fourth time interacting with the Envision Oak Park process (or fifth if you include my on-line participation). It was a keypad voting session where we got to see what the previous focus groups had identified as issues. Then we voted on our top priorities among them. While keypad voting can be a little dull and certainly doesn't feel like real interaction, it was a good exercise.

I was most pleased to see that diversity was included as one of the 4 core values of the process. In the past, comprehensive plans were only about zoning, land use, codes, and other strict planning issues. Today, comprehensive plans look at quality of life as well. And, the quality of life in Oak Park is deeply rooted in our ability to promote a diverse, integrated, and inclusive community.

That said, I would really like to see elements of the comprehensive plan that address and prioritize activities and policies that will sustain and improve upon the progress we've made as a community.

I think we should prioritize community development infrastructure and business recruitment of retail and similar businesses in the smaller business districts. In my opinion, Downtown Oak Park, the Hemingway District, and Pleasant are extremely important to the community's tax base and appeal. But, I also think that these districts have a lot of comparative advantages already. It is very important to ensure that there are vital business districts throughout the community. With the new gymnastics center going up on Lake, I think momentum is building there for investment by others. Meanwhile, I would like to see increased attention on the Arts District, Chicago and Austin, and Southtown. These are vital districts for the surrounding neighborhoods and the right kinds of businesses (retail, restaurants, galleries, etc.) can make a big difference in the desirability to live near them. Growth in these districts could also go a long way to improving the walkability of Oak Park.

Of course, we can't forget about North Avenue and Roosevelt Road. But, I'm unsure about what could be done to improve either. It is particularly difficult for Roosevelt road since the other side of the street allows for incentives and assistance from a TIF district that is driving decisions for business location there.

Meanwhile, in DTOP, I think we should focus more on commercial office space that would improve job opportunities here, support local businesses through increased daytime traffic, and broaden the tax base. They would also be good uses for a transit-centered district like DTOP. Workers could reach their jobs without needing to drive. If we took advantage of Oak Park's cultural vibrancy as well, we should be able to draw businesses that hire "creative class" professionals.

Regarding transit, I would also like to see a Metra stop at Austin Boulevard. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people express an interest in an Austin Metra stop. It would definitely have high ridership and it would ensure transit equity in Oak Park. Meanwhile, it could spur a rebuilding of the Austin Green Line stop. That could improve a gateway to Oak Park.

And speaking of improving rail stops, the Blue Line stations could use a serious facelift. There should also be card vending machines at the alternate entrances for each station and the stations should be made accessible.

A Bus-Rapid-Transit route on North Avenue would be great. I can imagine a route that went east on North Avenue and then switched to Grand. We need better transit options in northern Oak Park. Since I don't expect a new rail line, BRT would be the next best option.

Meanwhile, I'd like to see some reinvestment within Village Hall in the Community Relations and Housing Programs departments. Both are vital to the community and both have the potential to be even stronger and more effective departments. They have important roles to play in ensuring integration, inclusion, and equity in the community.

Of course, this is just a small portion of all we could be doing with a document labeled "comprehensive plan." In fact, it's only a fraction of the ideas I would recommend. What would you add? I would love to hear you thoughts and ideas. The planning process for Envision Oak Park isn't over yet. There's still quite some time. Add your voice to the discussion here. And, don't forget to check out the Envision Oak Park website where you can learn more and take a community survey.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and RiverForest.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

JRM from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 11th, 2013 3:15 PM

Rob - Re your statement: "In the past, comprehensive plans were only about zoning, land use, codes, and other strict planning issues. The statement is wrong. Chapter ll Housing of the 1990 Oak Park Comprehensive Plan (the comprehensive last plan written by the village contained 18 pages of narrative, goals, and specific recommendation on Housing (Public and Private) and Diversity.

Rob Breymaier from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 11th, 2013 12:46 PM

I don't have crime and safety issues in here because 1) While it would be great to have no crime, crime is already low in Oak Park; and 2) I have no worries about the commitment of the Village, Township, and others to work hard on crime prevention.

Resident X  

Posted: March 9th, 2013 8:28 PM

OK Rob, you've got good suggestions, especially with regards to development on Chicago and Austin... But what about crime and safety? A large part of retaining a high quality of life in a place is safety, yet this is not even addressed in your letter. What would you propose?

Brian Chang from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: February 27th, 2013 5:13 PM

I like a lot of what you've proposed, but despair of any of it coming to fruition. On a more modest scale, I'd like to build on the current strengths of OP. We have decent transit-oriented development extending along Lake St from Harlem to a bit east of Oak Park Ave. We should encourage further TOD eastward (along Lake St) to Ridgeland (and eventually Austin. An Austin Blvd Metra stop would be a great anchor, but I don't think that's ever going to happen. Instead, we should focus on the Green line stations as hubs for TOD. As development in Chicago creeps westward along the Fulton/Kinzie corridor, access to the Green line will become increasingly desirable. When the Ike gets reconstructed, hopefully we can get a better pedestrian experience around the Blue line stations. A full Ike cap is probably out of the question, but a partial cap that allows an intact streetscape (http://www.oak-park.us/images/Ike/2012_OP-Oak-and-Ike_bridge-after.jpg) might be possible. Its been done before in other cities.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments